The Last King of Scotland has been one of the more popular movies to hit the screens in Nairobi in quite a while. A lot of the shows are packed. And it is drawing people of all colors and stripes. It has been interesting to discuss the movie with folks here. I recently had a conversation with a very bright Kenyan lady about the movie. The most striking aspect of the movie was how we intrepreted certain key scenes in the movie.
Before I get into the differences in our perspectives, let me assure you that we agreed on the following. First, we both agreed that Forest Whitaker totally deserved his Academy Award for his portrayal of Idi Amin. He was totally "African" in his mannerisms, his speech, his accent, and his swagger. My friend commented, "If I hadn't known he was American, I would have thought he was Ugandan." Second, we both agreed that Idi Amin was a totally disturbed person and that his reign of terror was a disaster. Thrid, we both agreed that the "mzungu" (white person) doctor in the movie was a complete idiot (but for different reasons).
What we saw differently occurred in two important scenes. First, in the critical first meeting of Idi Amin and Dr. Garrigan, the dictator has a mildly hurt hand after his car hit a cow. As the doctor tends to Amin, the cow is grunting and snorting in pain. It is distracting. The soldiers are raising even more noise because they are trying to talk to the owner of the cow. Frustrated by the continued noise the agonizing cow is making, Garrigan grabs Amin's gun (which is on the roof of the car), boldly walks over to the cow, and puts it out of his misery.
As the scene developed, I saw this coming. I could tell that the Scottish doctor was actually more concerned with the agonizing cow than he was with the small hand injury Amin had. And so I wasn't surprised by his "brazen" actions to euthanize the cow. But my Kenyan friend was totally shocked and annoyed that he would so callously and boldly shoot the cow in the presence of the farmer and the soldiers. She was so upset that he presumed to do that without talking to the farmer. And so that was difference number one.
The second difference came a few scenes later when Amin offered Dr. Garrigan the opportunity to become his personal physician. After initially denying the offer, Dr. Garrigan decides to accept; not because he is fearful of upsetting Amin, but because of the "perks" that he sees can be his. While my Kenyan friend and I both agreed he should have rejected the offer, we differed as to why. I felt he should have walked away to avoid the temptations and snares that he would find himself. My Kenyan friend thought he should have rejected the offer because he was an outsider; what did he know about Africans and the way Africans work and think? Nothing. Reject the job because he doesn't know what he is doing. Period.
And so our differences ran. We actually agreed about most things, but our reasons were different. And that was a surprising revelation to me. Even after living here for more than two years, I realize that I still don't understand the mindset of my Kenyan friends. And that is what the movie clearly showed - the mzungu REALLY didn't have a clue what he was getting himself into. And that is why I like this movie. It shows how important it is to get to know our friends from different lands and cultures. The little things to us may be big things to them.
If you haven't seen the movie, I highly recommend it (even though there are a few scenes that are a little over the top on sensuality). And when you watch it, don't just focus on the plot...watch the sub-plots and the sub-text of what is going on. It will surprise you. And teach you a lesson about folks different than us.