I have been having an interesting dialogue with a missionary physician here in Kenya. He is associated with the teaching programme in Family Medicine. We have had some philosophical differences that we have been conversing about. It has been very interesting.
Yesterday, I sent him an email quoting Abraham Kuyper. Here is the quote and what I said:
"Abraham Kuyper (who was a prominent Dutch leader) said: 'In the total expanse of human life there is not a single square inch of which the Christ, who alone is sovereign, does not declare, "That is mine!"' That is why I am here. I believe these words. I believe that every aspect of life belongs to God and that He is the rightful "owner". As Christians we are to reclaim those areas that have been usurped. That means that we are not to isolate ourselves in Christian communities but expand our influence into every single sphere of life."
He sent me a reply with this comment:
"I don't think it is up to us to "reclaim" because I don't think the sovereignty of Christ has been truly "usurped"; no human or spirit or "god" has the power to send Christ into exile. Kuyper's comment does not have Christ saying, "That should be mine" but rather "That is mine!" To me, talk of "reclaiming" sounds a little like what the Crusaders wanted to do. Since Christ is in fact soveregin in every square inch, I don't want to reclaim it as much as recognize His sovereignty which is already there."
To which I sent a lengthy reply which follows. The reason I share all of this is that I think it speaks to the heart of why I am here. I thought I would not only share my thoughts with my colleague, but you, the reader, as well.
"I would say that there is the reality of the "usurper" who is the prince of this world - not the King, but a prince and a usurper. And this prince has brought in evil and deception into the world. And through this deception many do not live out the Biblical directives and mandates in life. Every institution (especially the church) has been corrupted because every person has been corrupted. And so there is injustice in the world - in business, in healthcare, in banking, in commerce, in government.
But God has given us direction on how to live. He comments on the principles in which to work in business, healthcare, banking, commerce, and government. And His Word tells us He would rather have us "do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with our God."
I think the stumbling block for the missionary community is the assumption that clear Biblical priniciples equates with clear practical implementation. Sometimes Scripture is very clear ("Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal.") on what should be practically implemented. Other times it does not (although we think it does).
For instance, last month I was asked by the Christian Medical Fellowship to facilitate a workshop on Condoms and Abortion at a CMF Medical Student Regional Conference. Essentially they wanted to have a discussion on the Medical Ethics on Sexuality. In my preparation I realized that there was a preference for me to TELL the students WHAT to do in this situation or that situation. But as I examined Scripture in preparation I realized that although the Bible is clear on principles it was NOT always directive on practice (although there were some directives). So, to the frustration of the students, I presented many principles but few directives. I felt that although I have opinions about what is right or wrong in medical ethics, my role was to introduce Biblical principles of sexuality while at the same time keeping in mind "Christian liberty."
I am afraid that my use of the word "reclaim" has conjured up images of the Crusaders killing and destroying. Maybe I should have used the word "reform". For example, I think the examples of Joseph and Daniel in the Bible provide excellent instruction to reclaiming/reforming government. These Biblical accounts spell out principles in these situations but I do not believe they should be directive (ie, by "directive" in mean exact examples of how we should implement the change). The Biblical account shows both men to be strong in faith, strong in reliance on God, willing to be incarcerated wrongly, willing to stand on principle. Both lived in horribly corrupt places with corrupt governments. And yet, because of their talents and character they were placed in situations where they profoundly impacted the culture. They "reclaimed" or "reformed" government without "revolt".
So how does my above example relate to this discussion? I think it points out that as Christians HOW we are to go about "reclaiming" must be done in the context of what God desires (do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly) as well as in the context of Christian liberty. To use a medical analogy there are times when it is appropriate to revascularize a dying limb and another when it is appropriate to amputate that dead limb. And as we know, this decision depends on multiple factors - patient age, resources, physician confidence and competence (or incompetence).
So, although I am a splitter by nature, I think that this is a "both, and" discussion. We must certainly recognize that God is present. He was, is, and always will be. He is present in every situation whether it be tsunami's, hurricanes, government corruption, or other of life's tragedies. But I do think that He has called us to participate in the reclaimation/reformation of the world in which we live. And this must be done in love "faith, hope, and love - the greatest of these is love." If we do the "right thing" the "wrong way" we have not done it for His glory but our own. We are called to do it His way for His glory ("for my thoughts are not your thoughts, and my ways are not your ways") This is the difficult part, taking Biblical thinking and principles and implementing God's way.
Because this is so fraught with human error and sin, we must move forward (do justly and love mercy) in the most humble way.
It is by His grace and mercy that He uses sinners such as us for such a task as this."